Graham Parman v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202423-35557California968 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRAHAM PARMAN, No. 23-35557

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05916-GJL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Grady J. Leupold, Magistrate Judge

Submitted November 19, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, H. A. THOMAS and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Graham Parman appeals the district court’s order affirming the agency’s

denial of disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On appeal, Parman disputes the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”)

evaluation of: (1) Parman’s subjective testimony as to his mental impairments; (2)

a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.