Torres

Torres v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202424-3164California802 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: LUIS TORRES; DOROTHY No. 24-3164 TORRES, AKA Dotty Torres, D.C. No. ____________________________ 5:24-cv-00065-KK-SHK

LUIS TORRES; DOROTHY MEMORANDUM*

TORRES, AKA Dotty Torres,

Petitioners,

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE,

Respondent,

JAYCO, INC.,

Real Party in Interest.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Argued and Submitted November 5, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Luis and Dorothy Torres (“Petitioners”) seek a writ of mandamus directing

the district court to vacate its March 6, 2024, order granting a motion to transfer

venue. The motion was based on an Indiana forum-selection clause in a warranty

agreement between Jayco, Inc. (“Jayco”) and Petitioners covering a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.