Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202423-2504California758 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MALKIT SINGH, No. 23-2504 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-065-221 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Malkit Singh (“Singh”), a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the

denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

When, as here,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.