Singh
Singh v. Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MALKIT SINGH, No. 23-2504 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-065-221 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 19, 2024** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Malkit Singh (“Singh”), a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of
a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the
denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his applications for asylum, withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.