Diaz-Rosales

Diaz-Rosales v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 202423-2686California881 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRICELDA LISBETH DIAZ- No. 23-2686 ROSALES; ELMER ALEXANDRIA Agency Nos.

QUINTEROS-FUENTES; KIMBERLIN A203-767-412

ARACELY QUINTEROS-DIAZ, A203-767-411

A203-767-413

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2024** San Jose, California

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Gricelda Lisbeth Diaz-Rosales and Elmer Alexandria Quinteros-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Fuentes, 1 natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.