People v. Stanfield CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 2024F087179California5,307 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

In 2010, appellant and defendant Deaundre Noble Stanfield (appellant) was convicted after a jury trial in the Superior Court of Fresno County case No. F08906045, of two counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm with enhancements for personal use of a firearm, and other offenses. He was sentenced to a determinate term of 22 years four months, including a prior prison term enhancement, and the judgment was affirmed on direct appeal. In or about 2022, appellant was identified by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) as a person eligible for recall and resentencing pursuant to Penal Code1 section 1172.75, because a prior prison term enhancement was imposed. The trial court recalled appellant’s sentence and conducted a full resentencing hearing, and appellant was sentenced to 19 years four months in prison. On appeal, his appellate counsel filed a brief that summarized the facts with citations to the record, raised no issues, and asked this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has filed a supplemental brief. We review his contentions and affirm.

All further statutory citations are to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.