Areys
Areys v. Mayorkas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABSHIR HASAN AREYS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-02104-JES-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU, and CHRISTINE LUJAN, [ECF No. 2] Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Abshir Hasan Areys’ (“Plaintiff”) Application 21 to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Motion”). ECF No. 2. 22 Plaintiff filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus on November 8, 2024. ECF No. 1. 23 Parties instituting a civil action must pay a filing fee of $405 unless they are granted 24 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). A party need 25 not “be absolutely destitute” to proceed IFP. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 26 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). “Nonetheless, a plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty ‘with 27 some particularity, definiteness, and certainty.’” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d…