Ramirez Canseco v. Garland
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS RUFINO RAMIREZ CANSECO, No. 23-1572 Agency No. Petitioner, A075-521-365 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 20, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Carlos Rufino Ramírez Canseco (Ramírez), a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying his
motion to reopen. Ramírez’s motion to reopen is both number and time barred
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because it is his second motion to reopen and was filed more than 14 years after
the date of the final order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C)(i).…