Jones

United States v. Jones

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 202423-3045California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3045 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:09-cr-01250-W-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PATRICK JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Jones (Jones), who was convicted of sexual exploitation of a child in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e), appeals the district court’s denial of his

petition for a writ of error coram nobis. “We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1291,” and, reviewing de novo, we affirm the district court’s denial of Jones’

petition.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.