Williams v. Bombardier Recreational Products CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2024D082748California5,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 11/22/24 Williams v. Bombardier Recreational Products CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TYSON WILLIAMS, D082748

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIC1903365)

BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL

PRODUCTS, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Irma Asberry, Judge. Affirmed. Carpenter & Zuckerman, John C. Carpenter, John P. Kristensen, Frank M. Mihalic, Jr., and Asa O. Eaton, for Appellant. Yoka Smith, R. Bryan Martin, Shauna W. Avrith, and Patrick Ball, for Respondents. Tyson Williams (whose motion to substitute himself as appellant we grant in this opinion) appeals a judgment after the trial court entered an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.