Dow

Dow v. Burrell CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2024B330855California1,368 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 11/22/24 Dow v. Burrell CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ANDREW DOW, B330855

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19CHCV00604 v.

MELVIN JAMES BURRELL et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Melvin D. Sandvig, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Michael Labrum and Michael Labrum for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of Martin S. Kovalsky and Martin S. Kovalsky for Defendants and Respondents. ____________________ Andrew Dow purchased a house from Tonette Wright. Unhappy with the purchase, Dow then sued Wright, her real estate agent, and various companies with which the real estate agent was connected.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.