Barker

(PC) Jenkins v. Barker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20152:17-cv-01865California1,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR., No. 2:13-cv-2273 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LARES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the court. First, plaintiff states that he will not proceed against defendants Newton, C. Nelson, C. Hale, Lt. Angulo, J.D. Lozano, and Young. (ECF No. 11 at 4-5.) In addition, plaintiff consents to the dismissal of the claims found not colorable in the August 13, 2014 order. (ECF No. 11 at 5.) Accordingly, defendants Newton, C. Nelson, C. Hale, Lt. Angulo, J.D. Lozano, and Young are dismissed from this action without prejudice. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.