Risby

Risby v. Hawley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20244:24-cv-06734California2,899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME S. RISBY,

Case No. 24-cv-06734-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED REBECCA HAWLEY, et al., 10 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jerome Risby, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted his application. See Docket No. 5. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not appear to allege federal jurisdiction, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing why his complaint is sufficient, no later than December 19, 2024. The Case Management Conference set for January 8, 2025 is vacated. II. ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT1 Plaintiff has filed a form complaint in this action, accompanied by a separate “Damages 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.