In Re: Amendment and Complete Restatement of the Arnold Rosenblatt Revocable Living Trust Established February 22, 2006

1 JS-6 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 In Re: Amendment and Complete

CASE NUMBER:

5 Restatement of the Arnold Rosenblatt Revocable Living Trust Estab. 02/22/2006, 6 CV 24-9890-MWF(BFMx) Plaintiff(s), 7 v. 8 Melya Kaplan Tsakirides,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

9 STATE COURT 10 Defendant(s). 11 12 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 13 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 14 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 15 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” 16 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 17 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 18 removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of…