Kumar

Kumar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202423-1080California974 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMAN KUMAR, No. 23-1080 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-629-072 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 7, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Aman Kumar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review from the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). “When, like here, the BIA issues its own decision but adopts particular

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. parts of the IJ’s reasoning, we review both decisions.” Iman v. Barr, 972 F.3d

1058, 1064 (9th Cir. 2020). “We review factual findings,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.