Kumar
Kumar v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202423-1080California974 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMAN KUMAR, No. 23-1080 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-629-072 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 7, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Aman Kumar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review from the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
(“CAT”). “When, like here, the BIA issues its own decision but adopts particular
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. parts of the IJ’s reasoning, we review both decisions.” Iman v. Barr, 972 F.3d
1058, 1064 (9th Cir. 2020). “We review factual findings,…