O'Malley

Smith v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202423-3220California960 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GWENDOLYN SMITH, No. 23-3220 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01537-JAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Gwendolyn Smith appeals the district court’s affirmance of the denial of her

Social Security disability insurance application. We reverse and remand.

1. The ALJ provided “specific and legitimate” reasons for discounting the

opinions of Dr. Briggs, Dr. Bhalla, and Dr. Steingart. Trevizo v. Berryhill, 871 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 664, 675 (9th Cir. 2017). Dr. Bhalla began seeing Smith six months after her

disability insurance coverage ended. There is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.