Ramirez

Ramirez v. Southern California Pizza Company CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2024G062245California10,980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gooding, J.

Filed 11/22/24 Ramirez v. Southern California Pizza Company CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ALEJANDRO RAMIREZ et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, G062245

v. (Super. Ct. No. JCCP 4725)

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIZZA OPINION

COMPANY, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded; appeal from order granting motion to compel arbitration dismissed. Capstone Law, Ryan H. Wu, Melissa Grant and Tyler Anderson for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Keller Grover, Eric A. Grover; Finkelstein, Blankinship, Frei- Pearson & Garber,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.