Pisco-Shupingahua

Pisco-Shupingahua v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 202423-3743California778 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARILUZ PISCO- No. 23-3743 SHUPINGAHUA; JULIO SERMENO- Agency Nos.

GAVANCHO; LEONARDO SERMENO- A246-045-987

PISCO, A246-045-986

A246-045-988

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 7, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mariluz Pisco-Shupingahua (“Pisco”), a native and citizen of Peru, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) dismissal of her appeal from

an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.