Hudacko
Hudacko v. Lee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWARD ALLYN HUDACKO, Case No. 23-cv-05316-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 96-100 JANET YI MAN LEE, et al., Defendants.
12 On November 15, 2024, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss all causes of action. 16 BACKGROUND Before the Court are several motions to dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Dkt. Nos. 96-100. Plaintiff filed the SAC on August 30, 2024. Dkt. No. 90 (“SAC”) at 1. Plaintiff repeats many allegations from the First Amended Complaint1 (Dkt. No. 19 (“FAC”)) in the SAC against the seven remaining defendants in this case: Rosenthal (University of California, San Francisco (“UCSF”) medical doctor specializing in endocrinology), Lee (UCSF medical doctor specializing in pediatric endocrinology), Ehrensaft (UCSF clinical …