Marcos Ramos v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20242:24-cv-00089California3,406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:24-cv-00089-HDV-E Marcos Ramos et al.,

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. NO. 39]

AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS [DKT. NO. 32]

Amazon.com, Inc., et al., Defendants. 17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Marcos Ramos, Sahara Antrim, Eldaa Soto, Marissa Barriga, Esme Nicolson- Singh, and Barbara Trevino (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action on behalf of a putative class against Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com International, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Services, Inc., Audible, Inc., and Alexa Internet (collectively, “Amazon”) for alleged violations of California Civil Code Section 1670.8—commonly known as California’s “Yelp Law.” Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Amazon’s “Conditions of Use” run afoul of the Yelp Law by prohibiting a wide range of protected speech, including anything that 9 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.