Junius J. Joyner, III v. Carrol A. Weimer, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20242:24-cv-10021California3,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-10021-JFW-AJR Date: November 25, 2024 Page 1 of

Title: Junius J. Joyner, III v. Carrol A. Weimer, Jr., et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION OR

TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On November 17, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Junius J. Joyner, III (“Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint alleging violations of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (the “Complaint”) against: (1) Carrol A. Weimer, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as a Prince William County Circuit Court Judge; (2) Clifford Lynwood Athey, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as a Court of Appeals of Virginia Judge; (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.