Moises Villalobos v. Albertsons Stores Sub LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20242:24-cv-10128California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOISES VILLALOBOS, Case No. 2:24-cv-10128-SB-PD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ALBERTSONS STORES SUB LLC,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Moises Villalobos, who is paraplegic and is substantially limited in his ability to walk, filed this suit alleging that Defendant failed to provide adequate parking facilities, in violation of, inter alia, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act. Dkt. No. 1.

Because Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim is closely related to his ADA claim, the Court has authority to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). However, supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right,” and district courts “can decline to exercise jurisdiction over pendent claims for a number of valid reasons.” City of Chi. v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172 (1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). This discretion is codified in § 1367(c):

The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under subsection (a) if— (1) the claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.