Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20245:22-cv-04224California1,352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, APPLICATION FOR FEES v. Re: Dkt. No. 127

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 14 I. BACKGROUND The Court previously deferred a ruling on Mr. Faizi’s request for attorneys’ fees in connection with a July 5, 2023 second motion for contempt that Mr. Faizi filed on Falafel Flame’s behalf. Dkt. No. 77; see also Dkt. No. 70. On August 15, 2024, the Court issued an order finding that “Falafel Flame may recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred” in connection with that second motion for contempt. See Dkt. No. 126 at 2. Additionally, the Court set a briefing schedule and noted that it would “amend its August 14, 2024 judgment, as may be appropriate, to include fees and costs, if any, that are awarded to Falafel Flame.” Id. at 3 n.2. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.