Ly

Ly v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20245:24-cv-06521California6,687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JEANNIE LY, Case No. 24-cv-06521-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

TESLA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Jeannie Ly filed this action in Monterey County Superior Court against defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. (“Tesla”) and Does 1-20 for violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), and California public policy. Dkt. No. 10-2. On September, 17, 2024, Tesla removed the action to this federal court, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Dkt. No. 1. Tesla now moves to compel arbitration pursuant to a contractual arbitration agreement and to stay the action pending completion of the arbitration. Dkt. No. 10. The Court held a hearing on the motion on November 19, 2024. Dkt. No. 16. Tesla appeared for the hearing; Ms. Ly did not.1 Upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.