Paula Conner v. USA
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-16045California590 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAULA CONNER, No. 23-16045
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01746-JAD-VCF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; C.K.
O'NEAL, IRS Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Paula Conner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction her action challenging tax withholding. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hughes v. United
States, 953 F.2d 531, 535 (9th Cir. 1992). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed…