Paula Conner v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-16045California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULA CONNER, No. 23-16045

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01746-JAD-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; C.K.

O'NEAL, IRS Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Paula Conner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction her action challenging tax withholding. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hughes v. United

States, 953 F.2d 531, 535 (9th Cir. 1992). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.