Najarro-Najarro

Najarro-Najarro v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202424-97California1,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL JEREMIAS NAJARRO- No. 24-97 NAJARRO; HAIDE QUISPE- Agency Nos.

CRUZ; DANIEL NAJARRO-QUISPE, A220-856-132

A220-856-133

Petitioners,

A220-856-134

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners are Peruvian nationals, Daniel Najarro-Quispe (Daniel) and his

parents, Daniel Jeremias Najarro-Najarro (Najarro-Najarro) and Haide Quispe-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cruz (Quispe-Cruz). They seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) order dismissing their appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.