Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-15567California696 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL COBB, No. 23-15567
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00241-JAS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Daniel Cobb appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims
Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wilhelm
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th…