Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-15567California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL COBB, No. 23-15567

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00241-JAS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Daniel Cobb appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims

Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wilhelm

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.