Williams v. State of Arizona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-1743California314 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-1743 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00695-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF ARIZONA; DANIEL
REYNOLDS; TEMPE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; UNKNOWN BAIR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Timothy Huntley Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from
his arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.…