Williams v. State of Arizona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-1743California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-1743 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00695-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF ARIZONA; DANIEL

REYNOLDS; TEMPE POLICE

DEPARTMENT; UNKNOWN BAIR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Huntley Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from

his arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.