Saccone

Williams v. Saccone

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-1763California441 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-1763 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00781-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

NICK SACCONE, Magistrate; ANTHONY NOVITSKI, Public Defender; STATE OF ARIZONA, Prosecutor; Honorable JAMES

A. TEILBORG, Senior District Judge,

Senior Judge, United States District Judge;

COUNTY OF MARICOPA;

SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT;

UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Adult Probation; MARICOPA COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT; UNKNOWN PARTY

2, named as legislature; UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, TALLMAN,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.