Saccone
Williams v. Saccone
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-1763California441 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-1763 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00781-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
NICK SACCONE, Magistrate; ANTHONY NOVITSKI, Public Defender; STATE OF ARIZONA, Prosecutor; Honorable JAMES
A. TEILBORG, Senior District Judge,
Senior Judge, United States District Judge;
COUNTY OF MARICOPA;
SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT;
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Adult Probation; MARICOPA COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT; UNKNOWN PARTY
2, named as legislature; UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, TALLMAN,…