Williams v. State of Arizona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-2143California481 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-2143 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00712-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF ARIZONA; ROGER

HARTSELL, Magistrate; UNKNOWN SPIRES, Officer; PAUL PENZONE, AKA Paul Pensone, Sheriff; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

ARIZONA; MESA POLICE

DEPARTMENT; MARICOPA COUNTY

SHERIFF'S OFFICE; UNKNOWN PARTY, named State of Arizona Magistrate Maricopa County Superior Court,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Huntley Williams appeals pro se from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.