Williams v. State of Arizona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-2143California481 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS, No. 23-2143 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00712-SPL--ESW Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF ARIZONA; ROGER
HARTSELL, Magistrate; UNKNOWN SPIRES, Officer; PAUL PENZONE, AKA Paul Pensone, Sheriff; ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
ARIZONA; MESA POLICE
DEPARTMENT; MARICOPA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE; UNKNOWN PARTY, named State of Arizona Magistrate Maricopa County Superior Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.