Estrada

United States v. Estrada

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 26, 202423-2015California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2015 D.C. No. 1:19-cr-02045-MKD-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUCIO ANGEL ESTRADA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Lucio Angel Estrada appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(B)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Estrada’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.