Multani

People v. Multani

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2024B332945California5,782 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 11/26/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B332945

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA093728) v.

FAHIM ANTHONY MULTANI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ricardo R. Ocampo, Judge. Affirmed. Alan Siraco, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Scott A. Taryle and David E. Madeo, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Fahim Anthony Multani appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for compassionate release under Penal Code section 1172.2.1 The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) indicated Multani has “a serious and advanced illness with an end-of-life trajectory” within the meaning of section 1172.2, subdivision (b)(1) and recommended that his sentence be recalled. Multani was diagnosed with stage IV lung…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.