Tisino

Tisino v. Allan CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2024B332932California1,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/26/24 Tisino v. Allan CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

TRACY TISINO, B332932

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18STFL01866) v.

COLLINS ALLAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Christine Byrd, Judge. Affirmed. Eloche P. Ukeje for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

___________________________ Collins Allan (Allan) and Tracy Tisino (Tisino) married in 1997, and Tisino filed for divorce in 2018. Following a five-day trial, the trial court entered a spousal support order. Allan challenges the Ostler-Smith1 provision in that order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.