Washington v. Burson CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2024A168553California1,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

Filed 11/26/24 Washington v. Burson CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

MATTHEW WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A168553

v. JAMIE LATRICE BURSON et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG17881145) Defendants and Respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Plaintiff Matthew Washington appeals from an August 2023 minute order granting defendant Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District’s (AC Transit) motion to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.2 At the outset of our review, it was apparent that Washington filed his notice of appeal from a nonappealable order. “[A] reviewing court is ‘without jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a nonappealable order, and has the duty to dismiss such an appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.