Doe
Doe v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES DOE, Case No. 23-cv-04734-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO STAY SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
ORDER
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 75 11 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff filed his complaint under a pseudonym. The Court subsequently issued an order requiring Plaintiff to proceed using his actual name. (Dkt. No. 68.) Plaintiff appealed that order, and he now seeks to stay the Court’s order while his appeal is pending. Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to stay the Court’s order requiring him to proceed under his actual name. Plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges State Farm “improperly and in bad faith denied coverage for his claim” involving a…