Protiviti Inc. v. Protiviti LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 PROTIVITI INC., Case № 2:23-cv-08442-ODW (PDx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v.
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
14 PROTIVITI LLC et al., [34]
15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION On June 12, 2024, the Court entered default judgment against Defendant 19 Protiviti LLC (“Defendant”). (Order Mot. Default J. 17, ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff 20 Protiviti Inc. (“Plaintiff”) now moves for attorneys’ fees. (Mot. Att’ys’ Fees 21 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 34.) The Motion is unopposed. For the reasons 22 discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Founded in 2002, Plaintiff is a global business consulting firm. (Compl. ¶ 12, 25 ECF No. 1.) Since its inception, Plaintiff has continued to market its services using 26 the “PROTIVITI” and “PROTIVITI-” formative trademarks. (Id. ¶¶ 13, 17.) Plaintiff
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the…