Hills

Hills v. City of Chula Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20243:23-cv-01067California10,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-1067-DMS-DDL

MANUEL LUKE HILLS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CHULA

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT,

COMPLAINT; DENYING

OFFICER SYMONETTE, OFFICER

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A

LOPEZ, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER

MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT;

BANDY, SERGEANT ALVAREZ,

DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

CHIEF ROXANA KENNEDY, AND

TO STRIKE

JOHN DOES 1 through 5, inclusive,

Defendants.

20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (TAC, ECF No. 53) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Defendants’ Motion, ECF No. 54). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a response in opposition. (Plaintiff’s Opposition, ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.