Bustamonte

Bustamonte v. Castillon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20245:22-cv-04725California2,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ISRAEL BUSTAMONTE, Case No. 22-cv-04725-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MOELLER'S MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

T. CASTILLON, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

13 Pro se plaintiff Israel Bustamonte, a state prisoner, asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Correctional Officer T. Castillo, Nurse F. Ssempewa, Nurse Phuc Le, Nurse F. Montegrande, Nurse L. Muriith, and Dr. Michael Moeller, for use of excessive force and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Dkt. No. 11. Mr. Bustamonte seeks declaratory relief and damages. Id. at 23-24. The Court found the amended complaint, liberally construed, stated a deliberate indifference claim under the Eighth Amendment against Dr. Moeller and other named medical staff. Dkt. No. 14 at 5-6. All parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. Nos. 4, 24, 38. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.