Alberto Guillen v. Johnson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 202423-35256California354 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 27 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERTO GUILLEN, No. 23-35256

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00019-BMM-JTJ v.

JOHNSON, Mr.; CANNON, Mr., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

PETER BLUDWORTH,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2024**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiff Alberto Guillen appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the

defendants in his prisoner civil rights action. We review the grant of summary

judgment and dismissal of claims for failure to state a claim de novo. Nonnette v.

Small, 316 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

Contrary to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.