Santos Ramos v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 202423-1539California1,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARITZA ESTELA SANTOS No. 23-1539 RAMOS; C.I.R.S., Agency Nos.

A216-379-111

Petitioners, A216-379-112 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 19, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Maritza Estela Santos Ramos and her minor son are citizens of El Salvador.

They petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) sustaining the Department of Homeland Security’s appeal of a decision by

an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) granting their applications for protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We grant the petition and remand to the BIA to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.