Clarence Boyce v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 27 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLARENCE ETHAN BOYCE, No. 23-55020
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-01576-CBM-SHK v.
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, United MEMORANDUM* States Secretary of Homeland Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 27, 2024**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Clarence Boyce appeals the district court’s judgment following a bench trial
on his Title VII retaliation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1291. We review the findings of fact for clear error and the conclusions of law de
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo. Langer v. Kiser, 57 F.4th 1085, 1100 (9th Cir. 2023).…