Calix Gonzalez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 202423-442California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARA LIZETH CALIX-GONAZLEZ, et No. 23-442 al., Agency Nos.

A215-670-101

Petitioners, A215-670-099

A215-670-100

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Sara Lizeth Calix-Gonzalez and her children, Daniella Sarahi Urbina Calix

and Deyvi Alexander Melgar Calix (collectively, Petitioners), natives and citizens

of Honduras, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision dismissing their appeal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.