United States v. Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 202424-2294California321 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2294 D.C. No. 6:16-cr-00002-DLC-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TRENT SCENTAIL SMITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Trent Scentail Smith appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of
discretion, see United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.