Sandisk Technologies, Inc. v. Viasat, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20244:22-cv-04376California789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et. al., Case No. 22-cv-04376-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AND

AMEND CASE CAPTION

VIASAT, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendant.

12 On May 9, 2023, Plaintiffs Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (“WDT”), Western Digital 13 Ireland Ltd. (“WDI”), SanDisk 3D IP Holdings Ltd. (“SD3D”), SanDisk Technologies LLC 14 (“SDT LLC”), SanDisk Storage Malaysia Sdn Bhd. (“SDSM”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a 15 first amended complaint against Defendant Viasat, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging infringement of 16 U.S. Patent Nos. 9,424,400 (“’400 Patent”), 10,447,667 (“’667 Patent”), and 8,504,834 (“’834 17 Patent”). See Dkt. No. 38 (“FAC”). When the FAC was filed, WDT was the title owner, SD3D 18 was the exclusive licensee and WDI held “all other rights and interests” to the ’400 and ’667 19 Patents (collectively, “Asserted Patents”). Id. 20 On September 20, 2024, Plaintiffs filed the present motion to substitute and amend case 21 caption. See Mot.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.