Seifert

Seifert v. Pritchard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20241:24-cv-01097California3,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No. 1:24-cv-01097-CDB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

KENNETH PRITCHARD, et al., (Doc. 1)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

15 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, 18 U.S.C. § 1018, 28 U.S.C. § 454, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed her complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on September 16, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). As set forth in more detail below, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and because Defendants are immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment and the common law doctrine of judicial immunity. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.