Seifert
Seifert v. Pritchard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No. 1:24-cv-01097-CDB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE
v. TO AMEND
KENNETH PRITCHARD, et al., (Doc. 1)
Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE
Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge
15 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, 18 U.S.C. § 1018, 28 U.S.C. § 454, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed her complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on September 16, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). As set forth in more detail below, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and because Defendants are immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment and the common law doctrine of judicial immunity. Accordingly, the…