Ocampo

Ocampo v. Avila

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20241:24-cv-01110California4,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Case No. 1:24-cv-01110-KES-SKO FIRST SCREENING ORDER ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT, OR

ESTEBAN OCAMPO,

(2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS FIRST Plaintiff,

AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 v.

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANT SANGHA’S “MOTION TO THE CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,

DISMISS COMPLAINT; FOR MORE

DEFINITIVE STATEMENT; MOTION Defendants.

FOR CONCISE STATEMENT AND TO

STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT” AND

PLAINTIFF’S “AMENDED MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

15 (Docs. 14, 18, 22, 24, 25)

TWENTY ONE-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Esteban Ocampo is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on October 16, 2024. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.