Arnold

Arnold v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Tort-Claims Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20241:24-cv-01388California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1:24-cv-01388-KES-BAM BYRON ARNOLD, et al., 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

15 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND Completed IFP Due: December 20, 2024 URBAN DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS CENTER; et al. 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Byron Arnold and Kimbly Arnold, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on November 13, 2024. (Doc. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff Kimbly Arnold filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 1, 2.) However, as there are deficiencies with the IFP application and Plaintiff Byron Arnold has not filed an IFP application, the Court will direct Plaintiffs to each file a new and separate application. First, under item 2 on the IFP application, Plaintiff Kimbly Arnold writes that their gross pay or wages are “$1300” and their take-home pay or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.