Yancey

Yancey v. CCFI Companies, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20242:24-cv-02187California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOVON YANCEY, No. 2:24-cv-02187-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER RELATING AND

CONSOLIDATING CASES

CCFI COMPANIES, LLC,

Defendant. JOVON YANCEY, No. 2:24-cv-02358-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. CCFI COMPANIES, LLC, Defendant. 21 Plaintiff Jovon Yancey proceeds with counsel in the above-captioned actions, alleging wage and hour violations. An examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the same district judge and magistrate judge will promote substantial efficiency and economy for the court and is likely to be convenient for the parties. ///// Moreover, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[i]f actions 2 before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.