Sahota

(PC) Gallegos v. Sahota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20242:24-cv-02776California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN GALLEGOS, No. 2:24-cv-2776 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the following reasons, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff filed the original complaint on October 8, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On October 16, 2024, this Court issued an order screening plaintiff’s original complaint. (ECF. No. 7.) This Court found that plaintiff’s original complaint raised potentially colorable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Sahota, Babbala and the “doe” defendants in claims one and three. (Id.) This Court dismissed claim two for failing to state a potentially colorable claim for relief. (Id.) This Court granted plaintiff thirty days to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court that plaintiff opted to proceed on the potentially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.