(HC) Glass v. People of the State of CA
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, No. 2:24-cv-2811 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, Respondents. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On July 8, 2024, plaintiff filed a document styled “Original Writ of Peremptory Mandate and Memorandum of Points and Authorities Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 702, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, Rule 8, and ‘F.R.C.P. § 1361,’” and invokes Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) As set forth below, plaintiff’s filing is dismissed with leave to amend.1 I. BACKGROUND In Stanislaus County Superior Court, No. 1027257, plaintiff was convicted by a jury of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and other offenses, with findings that defendant 26 This action was docketed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 23, 2024, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No.…