Valladolid

(PC) Harris v. Valladolid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20241:23-cv-01502California637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MUJAAHID F. HARRIS Case No. 1:23-cv-01502-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY v. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

VALLADOLID, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and has ordered the case to proceed. (ECF No. 9). Further, Defendants1 have filed a notice opting out of an early settlement conference. (ECF No. 20). Before scheduling this case, the Court will require each party to submit a statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from the date of service of this order. They should be filed with the Court, titled “SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY STATEMENT,” and include the name of the party filing the statement. They shall address all of the following issues: i. A brief summary of the parties’ claims and/or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.